Resources Delivered

Cited: Reuters

On March 10 the Senate passed a $149 billion jobless aid and tax breaks package in an effort to lower the 9.7% unemployment rate before congressional elections in November.

Barack Obama

The measure, approved by a vote of 62 to 36, now heads to the House of Representatives, where many Democrats have pushed for more aggressive job-creation measures in the face of the worst U.S. economic downturn since the 1930s.

President Barack Obama said the vote would help small businesses and jobless workers, and expressed thanks for the bipartisan support that it attracted.

“I am grateful to senators in both parties who took one more step forward today in getting our nation back on a solid economic footing,” he said in a statement.

Democrats say job creation is their top priority this year as they head into an election season that could possibly cost them control of Congress.

Both chambers have now passed two job-creation bills, but they have yet to resolve their differences and finish legislation that Obama can sign into law.

Democrats passed an $863 billion stimulus measure last year to battle the recession. That effort created up to 2.1 million jobs, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, but the high price tag has prompted a growing voter backlash.

The bill passed on Wednesday by the Senate largely continues existing government policies. Jobless workers would see their unemployment benefits and healthcare subsidies extended to the end of 2010, while businesses would once again benefit from $25 billion worth of tax breaks that expired at the end of 2009.

The bill’s $149 billion in new spending is partly offset by $37 billion in revenue raised by closing tax loopholes.

That could conflict with Obama’s plans to use the new revenue to help pay for his proposed healthcare overhaul.

For the small business who has actually benefited from some of the government aid . . . You can easily find a small business lender online at the government aid was not what you expected.  With a merchant cash advance, you will be able to get that much-needed equipment for your business.

HELP FOR STATES

Cash-strapped states would get $25 billion to help cover their portion of the Medicaid government-run healthcare program for the poor.

More help could be on the way for states, which face yawning budget deficits and, unlike the federal government, must balance their budgets each year.

Representative George Miller, a senior House Democrat, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would give state and local governments an additional $98.5 billion to help avoid layoffs of teachers, police officers and other public employees.

Other House Democrats say Congress should boost transportation spending to put more construction workers back to work.

Both the House and the Senate have approved a $13 billion payroll tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers, but the Senate needs to approve the measure again before Obama can sign it into law.

White House economic adviser Christina Romer said on Tuesday that a similar hiring credit proposed by Obama would generate 250,000 jobs at a cost of $13 billion.

The U.S. economy has shed 8.4 million jobs since entering the recession in December 2007, though the pace of job loss has slowed since the recovery began in the second half of last year.

More than 40 percent of unemployed Americans have been out of work for at least six months, the usual cutoff for jobless benefits. Congress extended the program to cover those out of work for nearly two years in some high-unemployment areas, but millions could still exhaust their benefits starting next month without a further extension.

Unemployment aid does not directly create jobs, but economists say it is a cost-effective way to stimulate the economy because recipients spend the money quickly.

It is going to cost $70 billion to extend benefits to the end of the year, which means it is not going to be chief.  Republicans, who already voted against the measure, argued that spending in other areas should be cut to cover its costs.

————————————-

My Take: Well, if the government would stop robbing Peter to pay Paul, they wouldn’t be in this mess.  It’s like their clunker program, people would junk a car just to get the money and now they’re finding out they can afford the payment on the new car they bought.  On the other end those that buy junk cars made a mint.  At least somebody made some money.

The politicians could also save money by using group hotel rates instead of staying in suites when they travel.  They could also take advantage of cheap airfare instead of flying first class.  Of course, that would be a miracle!  If they would like to perform a real miracle, why don’t they take a pay cut instead of making police, fire department and teachers take pay cuts?

I am sure that every politician has phone answering services filled with complaints every day.  Maybe if they would listen to some of the complaints on their answering service, they would have a little more insight into what their constituents really want.  But then that would require them to do a bit of work, wouldn’t it?

————————————-

Other Resources